Trends and data in the 2026 state of pet rentals report shows pet ownership and rental cooperation are rising but challenges exist.
A new survey released by PetScreening reports that 81% of rental housing operators report growth in pet ownership, and 68% now consider themselves “pet-friendly,” which means a variety of things ranging from more pets being allowed to more pet-focused amenities onsite.
The 2026 State of Pets in Rental Housing Report, based on feedback from 673 property managers and leasing professionals primarily within the multifamily and single-family sectors, details the effects of pet-inclusivity in the modern rental-housing world.
While 71% of U.S. households own a pet, according to the American Pet Products Association, PetScreening data shows that only 43% of renters report owning one. This figure is nearly 30 percentage points lower than the pet ownership rate reported by housing operators, suggesting that many pets in rentals may be unauthorized or underreported. The report aims to assess reasons for the disparity and ways operators can resolve related challenges.

While the rates of pet ownership in rentals continues to rise, operational challenges persist, as operators report pet damage and unauthorized pets are among the primary issues they face at their properties.
“Despite any operational challenges, the survey underscores the clear benefits of welcoming pets at rental communities,” said John Bradford, founder and CEO of PetScreening. “When pet strategies are optimized to embrace pet-inclusivity and reflect the desires of the modern renter, the advantages become more pronounced in the form of a wider resident pool, stronger retention and increased revenue. While the industry still can make significant headway, property managers are doing a commendable job of bridging the gap.”
Some of the gap between the overall U.S. pet ownership rate and the percentage of renters who say they own pets may be attributable to unauthorized and underreported pets onsite. This highlights the importance of accurate tracking, which can help operators collect their rightful pet-related revenue and avoid potential risks associated with unauthorized pets.
Digging into the Data: Popular Amenities, Common Restrictions
The survey also noted that pets are an increasingly key driver in renter decision-making, as renter search data from Apartments.com showed that more than half of renters utilizing pet filters search for dog-friendly communities. The most cited pet amenities offered by survey respondents included pet waste stations (45%) and pet parks (35%)—functional offerings that were significantly more prevalent than experiential features such as dog-walking services (24.9%) or pet-focused events (11.2%).
While some of the industry has shed blanket restrictions in favor of evaluating pets and their owners on an individual basis, most properties continue to have significant restrictions in place. Pet limits per household was the most cited by respondents (78.4%), while other traditional restrictions such as breed (66.7%) and weight limits (59.8%) continue to be prevalent as well.
Metrics specific to PetScreening included that the company’s clients experienced a 30.7% increase in revenue after implementing the platform, which underscored the impact of pet-friendly policies paired with formal tracking and screening tools. Additionally, PetScreening says its customers saved approximately 1.3 million administrative and legal hours reviewing assistance-animal accommodation requests, instead relying on the platform’s expertise, which also helped to reduce risk of regulatory violations and potential litigation.
The entire report can be accessed here.
About PetScreening:
PetScreening is a leading platform for managing pets and assistance animals. Offered at no cost to housing providers, the platform standardizes pet-risk assessment with digital pet profiles and FIDO Scores®, streamlines assistanc- animal reviews in compliance with HUD and Fair Housing guidelines, and helps identify unauthorized pets, all while supporting more pet-inclusive communities. Learn more at petscreening.com.
















FTC Seeks Comment On Potentially Unfair Rental Housing-Fees
The Federal Trade Commission has announced it is seeking written public comment on a notice of proposed rulemaking to address nationwide potentially unfair rental housing fees or deceptive fee practices in connection with rental housing.
As detailed in a Federal Register notice announcing an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the FTC is seeking written comments, including data, evidence, analyses and arguments, regarding rental housing fees and charges throughout a lease lifecycle, from application to moveout.
“Rental-pricing practices that are neither clear nor transparent undermine competition and harm consumers,” said Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “The Trump-Vance FTC is focused on addressing unlawful business conduct that obscures the actual cost of housing and undermines price competition.”
The failure to advertise the true total rent can limit consumers’ ability to make informed financial decisions, increasing their search costs and exposing them to other negative monetary consequences when they take on more rent than they can afford. These practices also may undermine competition by weakening the incentives of rental-housing providers who do advertise the true total rent.
The notice seeks comments on such topics as:
Unfair and deceptive rental housing fee practices violate federal law. In the past two years, the FTC has filed two cases challenging these fee practices by nationwide housing providers. Invitation Homes, the largest single-family home rental housing provider in the country, agreed to pay $48 million to settle FTC allegations that the company violated the FTC Act by, among other things, excluding mandatory monthly fees from the advertised rent.
Greystar Real Estate Partners, the largest residential rental property owner and manager in the nation, was ordered to change its fee disclosure practices and pay $23 million in consumer redress to settle a lawsuit by the FTC and the state of Colorado that alleged the company misrepresented the true cost of renting a property and excluded mandatory fees from the advertised rent.
Case-by-case enforcement, while essential, addresses only some aspects of the harmful fee practices in the rental housing industry. The notice announced this week explores whether a rule is needed to address hidden and misleading fees that inflate rent well beyond what is advertised and other problematic fee practices imposed throughout a lease lifecycle. It also would serve as a deterrent against those practices because it would allow the agency to seek civil penalties against violators and more easily obtain redress for harmed consumers.
Consumers can submit comments electronically for 30 days, ending April 11. Consumers also may submit comments in writing by following the instructions in the “Supplementary Information” section of the Federal Register notice.